Go
to Coffeehouse Observer for more coffeehouse observations.
All rights reserved by
Keith Michaud ©
Letters From Away is written by a Maine native Keith Michaud, who is now "from away" and living in California. It is about things happening in Maine and to Mainers. And he will throw in a story once in a while.
Here I am minding my own business with my friend
Brenda when the first photographic attack is launched. (Photo by Craig Sanders)
|
Here I am launching my counter offensive. (Photo by
Craig Sanders)
|
And here I am launching my last-ditch effort to
fight back the paparazzi horde. (Photo by Craig Sanders)
|
HEBRON, Maine — The Redneck Olympics “is disrespectful” to U.S. Olympic athletes, according to a letter from the United States Olympic Committee to Redneck Olympics organizer Harold Brooks of Hebron.On Saturday, Brooks received a letter from the USOC asking him not to use the name “Olympics” if he intends to hold the Redneck Olympics in the future. The committee doesn’t seek damages for the word’s use in the Aug. 5-7 event.Citing the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, the letter said there is “no question” that Brooks violated federal law by selling tickets to the Redneck Olympics, which cost $15 to $20 for the weekend, including camping. The act gives the USOC all rights to the word “Olympics” in the United States.“We believe using the name ‘Redneck Olympics’ for a competition that involves toilet-seat horseshoes and bobbing for pigs’ feet tends to denigrate the true nature of the Olympic Games,” the letter reads.Brooks objected to that characterization. “How can the people, the average person, in their activities, degrade anything?”Brooks said the letter hasn’t changed his mind on holding another Redneck Olympics, a move that could spur a lawsuit from the USOC, who have filed suits in other instances of people using the word “Olympics.”“They don’t scare me,” Brooks said Monday.
Lawmakers soon will be faced with radically different plans for redrawing the boundary between the state’s two congressional districts. One features straighter lines and a difference of only one person between the two districts — top priorities for the state’s Republicans. It does, however, move about 360,000 people from one district to another. The Democratic plan moves Vassalboro from the 1st District to the 2nd.
The choice for lawmakers should be easy — they should go with the simplest change that meets the requirements of the law and affects the fewest voters.
Recent history has shown this is unlikely to happen. Redistricting lines were imposed by the state supreme court in 2003 because lawmakers couldn’t agree on a plan. Maine doesn’t have to go down this road again.